Podcast Strategy for Wealth Advisors: What Should You Talk About

Quick take:

If you told me tomorrow that you're a wealth advisor and you want to start a podcast, I could give you 100 episode ideas in about five minutes.

How much should you save for retirement. What is diversification. Should you pay off your mortgage. Five tax mistakes. Market update. Roth this, portfolio that.

But this is exactly what I wouldn't do.

If your ideal client is a founder with most of their net worth trapped in one company, a complicated tax picture, an exit somewhere on the horizon, and potentially millions of dollars riding on a handful of decisions, a generic personal finance podcast is the wrong build.

My first question wouldn't be what topics you want to talk about. It would be which wealth advisor you are, because "high net worth individuals" isn't an editorial strategy. I'd want to know specifically:

Those are very different editorial worlds, and the narrower the commercial reality, the easier it becomes to find the right questions. Before any microphone gets turned on, I want to understand who tends to become a great client and what changes in their life shortly before they contact you.

Then I want their private worries, the questions they ask their spouse, the things they bring to Google or ChatGPT at eleven at night, the thing they feel slightly stupid asking because they've built a successful company and think they should already know the answer.

Those are the episodes, and notice how different they feel from Retirement Planning Strategies for High Net Worth Individuals.

This is very similar to something I ran into building a strategy for a functional medicine practitioner.

That industry has its own category language: root cause, optimal health, personalized care.

Wealth management has its version to: holistic planning, comprehensive wealth management, tax-efficient strategies, long-term financial security.

None of those are bad phrases. They just don't tell me much about how you think specifically.

If you already have a founder or expert-led show and you're realizing your episodes are mostly organized around broad service categories rather than actual buyer questions, the Founder Podcast Authority Audit's positioning and editorial strategy sections are useful for diagnosing your own catalog.

Take a very finance-y internal example, accumulation, allocation, bucket planning. All fine internally, but the client is probably thinking do I have enough money to retire without screwing this up. This isn't about dumbing down the expertise. It's translating the doorway, and once someone's inside the episode, the complexity can show up in full.

One example worth pointing at is McGee Tax & Wealth Advisors. What's interesting isn't that a wealth firm has a podcast, it's that the podcast sits inside a broader education ecosystem instead of floating off as its own media hobby. For an advisory business, the podcast should stay connected to the questions the firm is already helping people answer.

Finance professionals naturally use technical language because that's the language of the work, but sometimes that accuracy hides how useful an episode is to the person who needs it.

I also wouldn't organize the year like a brochure: January is retirement, February is taxes, March is estate planning, April is investments, etc… It’s neat for a content calendar, but fairly meaningless to the listener.

I'd rather build territories around periods and decisions in a client's life:

Even at this level, the difference is already noticeable. If the ideal client is a founder approaching an exit, the first four titles on the board might be:

Now I know who the show is for, the founder knows why to click, and the advisor has room to demonstrate actual judgment instead of reading a list of generic tips.

Financial services obviously come with compliance, and the answer isn't pretending that doesn't exist. The publishing workflow gets built around it, what needs review, where the boundaries are, the right disclosures, never making promises that can't be made, never turning a general podcast into personalized financial advice.

But compliance doesn't require removing all nuance and personality. One of the strongest things an advisor can say is "there are three things I'd want to know before I could answer that." Then name the three things. That's useful, it shows the reasoning, and nobody needs a hot take on next month's market to have an interesting show.

Say a founder asks on a call whether they should bring an advisor in before the sale, or deal with it once the money's liquid. A 15-minute episode can answer exactly that, and it gets sent directly to the prospect. That's where this becomes a publishing asset instead of another content obligation, the same idea covered in why old episodes should still be working for you months later.

Guests can make sense here too, a tax attorney, an estate planning attorney, an M&A advisor, or a founder who's been through an exit and can talk about what surprised them afterward. The guest is there because they help explore a decision the ideal client is making, not because they bring a following. That's a different guest strategy, and it protects the show from slowly becoming a networking podcast for the financial industry when the actual buyer is a founder approaching an exit.

Some advisors are fantastic conversationally and get interviewed, others do better with five bullet points and a strong question to react to. A compliance-sensitive episode might need more scripting.

What doesn't work is a smart advisor reading a stiff 2,500-word article into a microphone in compliance voice.

The expertise is already there, the production system should help it come out naturally, then get edited, titled, packaged into show notes, developed into a searchable article where useful, and internally linked to the relevant part of the client journey.

The people in the business should know the archive exists too. If the sales team keeps re-explaining a question the podcast already answers well, that's a gap in the system worth fixing.

I wouldn't judge this show by whether it hits 10,000 downloads. I'd want to know whether the right people are listening:

For a high-value advisory relationship, those are the signals that matter.

I wouldn't start with 50 or 100 episode topics about finance.

I'd start with the specific client, the moment they're in, the decision they're trying to make, then use the podcast to expose the decision tree underneath their questions.

Start with the specific type of client, a founder approaching an exit, an executive with concentrated stock, a family managing generational wealth, and build episodes around the private worries and decisions that come up shortly before they'd reach out, rather than general personal finance topics.

Move past category language like holistic planning or comprehensive wealth management. Show what those principles mean in practice, the specific questions asked, the variables that change an answer, and the reasoning behind a recommendation.

Build the publishing workflow around required reviews, boundaries, and disclosures, and avoid turning general education into personalized financial advice. Compliance doesn't require removing nuance or personality, an advisor can still explain their reasoning clearly within those limits.

It can, selectively. Tax attorneys, estate planning attorneys, M&A advisors, or founders who've been through an exit can help explore a specific decision the ideal client is facing, rather than being included purely for their following.

Download counts matter less than commercial signals: whether the right type of client is finding episodes, whether prospects mention them on calls, whether the sales team sends specific episodes during the process, and whether inquiry calls are getting more informed over time.

I take a wealth advisory business and work through the client questions I'd start with, the category language I'd get underneath, and how I'd turn the archive into something the sales process uses.

The Founder Podcast Authority Audit looks at your positioning, editorial strategy, packaging, discoverability, publishing system, and commercial path.

Take the Founder Podcast Authority Audit →