How to Get More People to Click on Your Podcast Episodes

Quick take:

You can make an excellent podcast episode that almost nobody listens to.

The audio can sound great, the guest can be brilliant, the information can be exactly what your ideal client needs.

None of that matters if the first thing they see is Episode 56: A Conversation About Leadership With [Guest Name].

Before someone discovers how good your content is, they have to decide whether it's worth their attention.

That decision happens through the idea, title, and visual they encounter first, and then, once they click, through the promise made in the opening.

That's what I call podcast packaging, and I think quite a few founder podcasts believe they have a content problem when what they have is a packaging problem.

Podcast packaging is how the value of an episode gets made visible to someone who hasn't listened yet. It includes:

Most podcast teams treat packaging as something that happens after production.

Record, edit, and then someone asks what to call it.

By that point, the most important packaging decision has already been made, or missed: what was the episode about.

A good title can make a strong idea clearer. It can't give a vague conversation a reason to exist.

Say a business podcast books a CFO with the editorial plan being "We're interviewing Jack, the CFO of XYZ Company."

You record for 55 minutes. Jack talks about his career, leadership, hiring, some predictions about the industry. It’s perfectly pleasant conversation. Then the producer opens the transcript and has to figure out what this episode is even about, and there isn't really an answer.

Compare that with deciding before recording that Jack should help answer why profitable companies still run into cash-flow problems during periods of fast growth.

Jack can still tell stories, tangents can still happen, it doesn't need to become a rigid scripted interview.

But now the conversation has a center, which makes the edit, the title, the thumbnail, and the article all easier afterward.

The first piece of packaging isn't the title. It's the idea.

Most niche business shows aren't interviewing famous people whose names alone generate clicks, and fortunately they don't need to. The advantage is specificity about a problem the audience cares about.

An architecture studio could record an episode about renovation budgets, that's a topic. Or they could go further: Why Luxury Renovation Budgets Keep Growing After Construction Starts.

Now there's a consequence, and a particular person who immediately understands why it matters.

One of my favorite questions when developing an episode is what's the private worry underneath this topic.

Say the topic is how to stay consistent with your diet. Reasonable enough.

But the person is probably closer to worrying “I'm spending money on this and I'll abandon it after two months and end up exactly where I started”.

That reframes into Why Most People Abandon Their Diets After 6 to 10 Weeks, which gets a lot closer to what the listener cares about. That should be the title of your episode.

Same in B2B. The topic might be hiring strategy for a growing company.

The CEO isn't lying awake thinking “I need better hiring strategy”, they're thinking

“The business is growing and I can't keep doing everything myself”.

Package from there.

This is also why I prefer focused episodes over broad ones.

Everything You Need to Know About Luxury Home Renovations contains a lot of information but gives no reason to care.

The Renovation Decision That Can Delay Your Project by Six Months has a consequence, tension, and a specific person for whom it's immediately relevant.

A niche podcast doesn't need every episode to appeal to everyone. I'd usually rather the right person see it and think “Wait, that's exactly what I'm dealing with”.

Once the idea is strong, the title has an easier job.

This is why titles like A Conversation About Leadership, The Future of Business, or Scaling With Purpose don't do much for me.

They sound professional and tell me remarkably little.

A strong title should usually answer at least one of these:

That doesn't mean every title needs to be sensational, but it means the value shouldn't be hidden.

This gets especially important on YouTube.

A founder podcast thumbnail often tries to squeeze in the host's face, the guest's face, the podcast logo, the guest's company logo, an episode number, and the full title, all inside one small rectangle.

What's my eye supposed to do with that?

A thumbnail's job is much smaller. Help the right person decide there's something worth investigating. That's it.

And because the thumbnail can carry part of the message visually, it changes what the title next to it needs to say.

A podcast team often creates one title, one description, one image, and distributes the exact package everywhere.

Sometimes that works. But I don't think it should be automatic.

An audio-platform title might benefit from being extremely clear and search-oriented.

A YouTube title can lean further into curiosity with the thumbnail carrying the rest.

The underlying episode doesn't change, the presentation does.

I’m not saying turn one episode into three unrelated pieces of content, no.

I’m taking about packaging the same idea for different discovery environments.

Someone clicked. But you're not finished.

The listener is asking “did the title tell me the truth?”.

Clicking Why Your Renovation Budget Keeps Growing After Construction Starts and then hearing "Welcome back everybody, we're so excited to have you here, before we begin don't forget to subscribe" makes me wait for an answer that isn't coming yet.

I’m not saying you need to answer the whole episode in 20 seconds, but you do need to confirm I'm in the right place.

Something like:

"If your renovation budget increased after construction began, it doesn't necessarily mean your contractor underestimated the project, there are three decisions we regularly see homeowners make after work starts that can add tens of thousands to the final cost"

and I'm staying. The title made a promise, the opening confirmed it.

Founders sometimes get uncomfortable here, they don't want serious expertise packaged like a stunt. Neither do I.

If an episode is titled The Renovation Mistake That Could Cost You $100,000, there had better be a legitimate $100,000 mistake in the episode. Otherwise you win the click and damage the thing the podcast was supposed to build, trust.

Individual episodes aren't the only thing to look at. Imagine discovering an architecture podcast and seeing:

Episode 34: Building a Scalable Architecture Practice With James,

Episode 35: Designing for People, Places and Purpose With Jessica,

Episode 36: The Future of Sustainable Architecture With Michael.

I still don't know what this show can teach me.

Now imagine seeing:

Why Your Architect's First Estimate Isn't Your Final Renovation Budget,

The Room Homeowners Regret Making Too Small,

What We'd Never Do Again After Designing 50 Custom Homes.

Now I can browse, recognize problems, and choose where to start.

Before recording, I'd want answers to five questions:

Then record toward that.

Afterward, the audio-platform title, the YouTube title, the thumbnail, the description, and the article all get a lot easier, because the producer isn't manufacturing a compelling premise from a conversation that never had one.

If the podcast is useful and almost nobody is clicking, I wouldn't immediately say: publish more often, buy better cameras, or cut ten clips from every episode.

I'd look at the idea, the title, the visual, and the opening promise, then zoom out and look at what those decisions built across the whole catalog.

Sometimes the expertise is already there. The people who need it just can't see why they should care yet.

Why is nobody listening to my podcast? If the content is strong, look at how episodes are packaged before creating more. Vague topics, generic titles, cluttered thumbnails, and slow openings can make useful episodes hard to choose. The listener has to understand why an episode matters before they can find out how good it is.

What is podcast packaging? How an episode's value is presented before and right after someone clicks. It includes the episode idea, title, thumbnail, description, and opening. Strong packaging begins during editorial planning, not after the recording is finished.

How do you write a good podcast episode title? Start with the listener's problem instead of describing the subject or guest. Ask what they're worried about, what consequence matters, and what they'll understand after listening, then make that visible without promising something the episode doesn't deliver.

Should podcast titles be the same on YouTube and Spotify? Not necessarily. The underlying idea stays consistent, but different platforms create different discovery environments. An audio-platform title might prioritize clarity and search, while a YouTube title can work with the thumbnail to build curiosity.

Is podcast packaging just clickbait? No. Good packaging communicates value that exists inside the episode. Clickbait promises something the content doesn't deliver. For a podcast built to establish trust, that distinction matters a lot.

Founder Publishing — Your Founder Podcast Is Good. So Why Is Nobody Clicking?

In the episode, I break down the four things I'd examine before telling a founder to create more content: the idea, title, visual and promise.

You might not need more episodes.

The Founder Podcast Authority Audit looks at your positioning, editorial strategy, packaging, discoverability, publishing system and commercial path so you can see where the real gap is.

Take the Founder Podcast Authority Audit →